Effort commitment tracking

Nobody can work
130% of the time.

Over-commitment is one of the most common audit findings in research administration — and it's almost always caught after the fact. Add the awards. See it now.

Try the full app free → commitment tracking, risk flags, a what-if planner, and RPPR effort tables. Runs entirely in your browser — your data never leaves your computer.

Effort across all active + pending awards Salary cap $ Base salary $
Award / projectSponsorEffort %Person-months
Total committed effort
0%
of 100% available
Total person-months
0.0
across 12 calendar months
Salary above the cap
$0
must be cost-shared, not charged

How to use this: EffortLedger does the arithmetic and flags the patterns that draw audit scrutiny. It doesn't know your award terms or your institution's policies, and the NIH salary cap changes — confirm the current cap and treat this as a check, not an authority. Your sponsored programs office has the final word.

Why it matters

The finding nobody sees coming

Over 100% is automatic

Commit 40% here and 70% there and you've committed 110% of a person who only has 100% to give. Auditors find this by adding columns.

The salary cap bites quietly

Salary requested above the cap can't be charged — the excess has to be cost-shared, and if nobody caught it at proposal, it's caught at award.

Pending counts too

Effort on pending proposals is a real commitment the moment they're funded. Tracking only active awards is how offices get surprised.

Pricing

Cheaper than one finding

$699/mo

per department · unlimited investigators

  • Effort across active + pending awards
  • Automatic over-commitment alerts
  • Salary cap & cost-share calculation
  • Certification reminders & audit trail
  • Export for your effort reporting system
Request a pilot

More tools like this

Built by the same team, free to try.